Perfil clínico, abordaje y pronóstico del paciente con shock cardiogénico sometido a traslado interhospitalario en España / Clinical profile, management and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing transfer between centers in Spain

Introducción y objetivos El objetivo es analizar el perfil clínico, el abordaje y el pronóstico del shock cardiogénico (SC) por infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST (IAMCEST) que requiere traslado interhospitalario, así como el impacto pronóstico de las variables estructurales de los centros en este contexto. Métodos Se incluyó a los pacientes con SC-IAMCEST atendidos en centros con capacidad de revascularización (2016-2020). Se consideró a: a) pacientes atendidos durante todo el ingreso en hospitales con cardiología intervencionista sin cirugía cardiaca; b) pacientes atendidos en hospitales con cardiología intervencionista y cirugía cardiaca, y c) pacientes trasladados a centros con cardiología intervencionista y cirugía cardiaca. Se analizó la asociación del volumen de SC-IAMCEST atendidos y la disponibilidad de cuidados intensivos cardiológicos (UCIC) y trasplante cardiaco con la mortalidad hospitalaria. Resultados Se incluyeron 4.189 episodios, 1.389 (33,2%) del grupo A, 2.627 del grupo B (62,7%) y 173 del grupo C (4,1%). Los pacientes trasladados eran más jóvenes, tenían más riesgo cardiovascular y recibieron más frecuentemente revascularización, asistencia circulatoria y trasplante cardiaco durante el ingreso (p<0,001). Los pacientes trasladados presentaron menor tasa bruta de mortalidad (el 46,2 frente al 60,3% del grupo A y el 54,4% del grupo B; p<0,001). Mayor volumen asistencial (OR=0,75; p =0,009) y disponibilidad de UCIC (OR=0,80; p =0,047) se asociaron con menor mortalidad. Conclusiones El porcentaje de SC-IAMCEST trasladados en nuestro medio es bajo. Los pacientes trasladados son más jóvenes y reciben más procedimientos invasivos. Los traslados a centros con mayor volumen y UCIC presentan menor mortalidad. (AU)

Introduction and objectives The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical profile, management, and prognosis of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) requiring interhospital transfer, as well as the prognostic impact of structural variables of the treating centers in this setting. Methods This study included patients with STEMI-CS treated at revascularization-capable centers from 2016 to 2020. The patients were divided into the following groups: group A: patients attended throughout their admission at hospitals with interventional cardiology without cardiac surgery; group B: patients treated at hospitals with interventional cardiology and cardiac surgery; and group C: patients transferred to centers with interventional cardiology and cardiac surgery. We analyzed the association between the volume of STEMI-CS cases treated, the availability of cardiac intensive care units (CICU), and heart transplant with hospital mortality. Results A total of 4189 episodes were included: 1389 (33.2%) from group A, 2627 from group B (62.7%), and 173 from group C (4.1%). Transferred patients were younger, had a higher cardiovascular risk, and more commonly underwent revascularization, mechanical circulatory support, and heart transplant during hospitalization (P<.001). The crude mortality rate was lower in transferred patients (46.2% vs 60.3% in group A and 54.4% in group B, (P<.001)). Lower mortality was associated with a higher volume of care and CICU availability (OR, 0.75, P=.009; and 0.80, P=.047). Conclusions The proportion of transfers in patients with STEMI-CS in our setting is low. Transferred patients were younger and underwent more invasive procedures. Mortality was lower among patients transferred to centers with a higher volume of STEMI-CS cases and CICU. (AU)

Clinical profile, management and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing transfer between centers in Spain.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical profile, management, and prognosis of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) requiring interhospital transfer, as well as the prognostic impact of structural variables of the treating centers in this setting. METHODS: This study included patients with STEMI-CS treated at revascularization-capable centers from 2016 to 2020. The patients were divided into the following groups: group A: patients attended throughout their admission at hospitals with interventional cardiology without cardiac surgery; group B: patients treated at hospitals with interventional cardiology and cardiac surgery; and group C: patients transferred to centers with interventional cardiology and cardiac surgery. We analyzed the association between the volume of STEMI-CS cases treated, the availability of cardiac intensive care units (CICU), and heart transplant with hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 4189 episodes were included: 1389 (33.2%) from group A, 2627 from group B (62.7%), and 173 from group C (4.1%). Transferred patients were younger, had a higher cardiovascular risk, and more commonly underwent revascularization, mechanical circulatory support, and heart transplant during hospitalization (P<.001). The crude mortality rate was lower in transferred patients (46.2% vs 60.3% in group A and 54.4% in group B, (P<.001)). Lower mortality was associated with a higher volume of care and CICU availability (OR, 0.75, P=.009; and 0.80, P=.047). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of transfers in patients with STEMI-CS in our setting is low. Transferred patients were younger and underwent more invasive procedures. Mortality was lower among patients transferred to centers with a higher volume of STEMI-CS cases and CICU.